Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Draft Fast Flux Initial Report

[Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>]

Do u have a preferred means of submitting comments?

I imagine some members are not overly fond of marking up .doc files using MSFT 
or Office comments and "track changes". Posting comments via email, citing 
section, page and paragraph is one alternative; if we choose this method, 
however, I would dearly like to avoid long, nested threads that results in 
"comments and tangential discussions on the comments" since this has proven 
problematic for us in the past. Publishing the document on the private wiki for 
"Wikipedia" style editing is yet another alternative (personally, this is the 
least palatable to me since the resulting accuracy and degree of consensus is 
iffy.)


If you will, please, Mike, assert a convention and declare some guidelines 
before we all dive into 60+ pages and overwhelm the group and our editors.


On 9/2/08 8:54 AM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



thanks Marika!

a note to the rest of the group -- i've got my fingerprints all over
this report.  i spent the weekend editing it and developing the "next
steps" portion.  so all the good ideas belong to Marika and all the
bad ideas are mine.

here's my hope.  i'd like to give this a preliminary once-over on
tomorrow's call, spend the week dinging away at the details and
approve it next week so that we can launch the Constituency review
and public-comment period.

btw, Eric had trouble opening the file.  if others do to0, let Marika
know and she can push along an RTF version that may be easier to digest.

m

At 05:32 AM 9/2/2008, Marika Konings wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>Please find attached the draft Fast Flux Initial Report for your
>review and discussion at tomorrow's conference call.
>
>With best regards,
>
>Marika
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.14/1646 - Release Date:
>9/1/2008 6:03 PM