Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Proposed additional text, section 5, answering 5.2-5.7 at 365-379

[Joe St Sauver <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike mentioned:

#c'mon guys.
#
#Dave's list predates the whole huge discussion about the difference 
#between the harms attributable to fast flux the technique and the 
#attacks that fast flux enables.  that's at the heart of the 
#"troubles".  to staple that list in there as it stands would be to 
#overlook that whole discussion.

I didn't hear compelling material in the discussion that followed
Dave's note that makes me believe it lost value or applicability.

I'd still like to see Dave's text included.

Regards,

Joe

Disclaimer: all opinions strictly my own