ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ff-pdp-may08]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately

  • To: "'Dave Piscitello'" <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Martin Hall'" <martinh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
  • From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:58:10 -0500

Yes, these are useful basic stats.  Jose and Martin, do you have any
objections to including the numbers in the report, and if not, how would you
describe your metrics?  (# fluxing domains observed, per day, over time,
etc.)

Each provider finds names, and decides which to monitor, in different ways I
am guessing.

Similar volume stats from other providers would also be interesting.  

All best,
--Greg




-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Piscitello [mailto:dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:00 AM
To: Martin Hall; Greg Aaron
Cc: jose nazario; Fast Flux Workgroup
Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately

Isn't this (# fluxing domains observed, per day, over time) the kind of
statistic we should include in the report?


On 11/19/08 6:40 PM  Nov 19, 2008, "Martin Hall" <martinh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
>
> We're seeing day-to-day variance as usual but up to around 6,000
> fluxing domains on any single day prior to Nov 4 down to around 3,500
> post Nov 4. Numbers have started to creep up again above 3,500 on
> certain days since then.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Greg Aaron wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear Jose and Martin:
>>
>> Can you comment on how many FF domains were you seeing before
>> November 4,
>> and now?
>>
>> All best,
>> --Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Hall
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:31 PM
>> To: jose nazario
>> Cc: Fast Flux Workgroup
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
>>
>>
>> Jose,
>>
>> Yes, that's what we're seeing too, starting around Nov 4.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:12 AM, jose nazario wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> with the demise of EstDomains and McColo, we're seeing a drop in the
>>> number
>>> of fast flux domains we're monitoring. i want to see if this is a
>>> legit drop
>>> related to these two origins of badness being deep 6'd or if this is
>>> an
>>> artificial drop due to some errors on our end.
>>>
>>> so, anyone else monitoring fast flux seeing a ~50% drop in the
>>> number of
>>> active domains per day in the past two weeks?
>>>
>>> -- jose
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> jose nazario, ph.d.  <jose@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Arbor Networks      www.arbornetworks.com
>>> v: (734) 821 1427
>>> PGP: 0x40A7BF94
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Hall
>> skype: martin-hall
>> +1-408-838-2890
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Martin Hall
> skype: martin-hall
> +1-408-838-2890
>
>
>
>





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy