<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
- To: <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dave Piscitello'" <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Martin Hall'" <martinh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Fast Flux Workgroup'" <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
- From: jose nazario <jose@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:08:48 -0500
On 11/20/08 11:58 AM, "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, these are useful basic stats. Jose and Martin, do you have any
> objections to including the numbers in the report, and if not, how would you
> describe your metrics? (# fluxing domains observed, per day, over time,
> etc.)
I have no objections. Ours are "active" fast flux domains within any 24h
window; we wait 24h from the time that any name MAY have been parked or
discontinued to call it inactive.
> Each provider finds names, and decides which to monitor, in different ways I
> am guessing.
Yes, discovery and qualification differ. We have described our metrics in a
paper from earlier this year.
Now to figure out why martin's numbers are so much higher than ours. :)
gotta improve our discovery.
-- jose
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|