ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ff-pdp-may08]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] 5.4

  • To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] 5.4
  • From: Rod Rasmussen <rod.rasmussen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:45:54 -0800

Hi Folks,

Unfortunately I will not be able to participate in the bulk of the call Friday, as I have a commitment tomorrow morning, but I wanted to make some points here.

I think the ordering that James is proposing is appropriate both from a proportional assessment and political standpoint. I would rephrase the entire section to something more akin to the following though, as I think we need to flesh this out a lot more to both point out the real issues we're wrestling with but not cast aspersions onto the registrar community as a whole that has done a lot to become more responsive to these issues. One particular point is that "most" registrars have not been involved in FFLUX hosting since many of them by raw count are either little utilized, used for threads to the registries, or are simply sub-registrars to larger operations and don't take direct registrations from the public.

1) Most registrars are -not- involved in FF or double-flux due to their business models that don't provide direct public access for the registration of domain names in volume. Many of those who do offer such services invest significant resources (time, money, personnel) working against the practice, and in the generic case of online fraud.

2) Of the registrars where FFLUX domains are registered by miscreants, the vast majority are unwitting participants in the schemes, largely due to ignorance of the problematic registrations. Once informed of a problem, most of these registrars act fairly quickly to deal with such domains, as they usually result in abuse issues and charge-backs on the credit cards used to register them which negatively impacts a registrar. However, some registrars appear to take consistently longer to deal with them than their peers. This could be due to many factors: staffing levels, standard procedures, and communications channels. Anecdotal evidence points to weaknesses in all of these factors in such cases and no actual intent to delay shut-down of a fraudulent or criminal scheme being perpetrated by a FFLUX attack.

3) Some registrars and more often resellers of registrar services have the APPEARANCE of facilitation of FFLUX domain attacks. In the case of an apparent "rogue reseller" registrars are usually swift to deal with such parties once made aware of the problems they have caused. Such incidents have been communicated privately to mitigation agents and discussed in some cases publicly in defense of registrar practices (the recent DirectI blog reference here could be useful).

4) While no registrar has been prosecuted for facilitating criminal activities related to FFLUX domains, there is at least one recent case where some would argue there is the appearance of complicity: ESTDomains. Activities surrounding their involvement with a disproportionately large number of fraudulent domains including FFLUX domains has been widely reported in the press (Washington Post ref/ Knujon Report/Intercage exposés) along with the conviction of their president for money laundering and credit card fraud. Recent actions to remove their registrar service credentials by ICANN, combined with de-peering of Intercage and McColo, hosting companies that both hosted a large amount of highly undesirable and criminal content AND a large number of domains registered by ESTDomains, resulted in dramatic reduction in spam across the entire Internet (lots of current press references).

Thus there is a wide range of "involvement" and reaction to FFLUX domains by the diverse members of the domain registrar community. The vast majority of actual involvement by registrars is largely as an unwitting provider of services which end up victimizing the registrars as well, as these types of domain registrations are often never legitimately paid, and create support overhead to deal with abuse issues. However, there is at least the possibility that at least one registrar could have become involved in directly facilitating such activities.

So there's my 2 cents on this - hopefully this is helpful for the discussion, my apologies for missing most of it.

- Rod

On Nov 16, 2008, at 6:40 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:

Hi Mike:

I agree with the sentiments behind many of your points below, and offer the following suggestions:

1. Most registrars are -not- involved in FF or double-flux, and invest significant resources (time, money, personnel) working against the practice, and generic online fraud. This should be stated first, and emphasized in the introduction. 2. The assertion of registrar involvement within the report should reference some sort of external data, ICANN / SSAC findings, or articles in industry / general media. Doing so will lend weight to the claim, and preempt counterarguments. 3. We may also note that registrar participation in FF or double- flux often require that said registrar offers hosting services, and that these non-registration services are outside the scope of ICANN.

Thoughts?

J.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] 5.4
From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, November 14, 2008 11:35 am
To: <gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx>

681 The WG has no hard evidence that any registrar intentionally facilitates fast flux hosting

682 attacks.

I appreciate all the work that went into this Section by many folks, but I think the opening sentence is not true, and think it is likely to be harmful to efforts against fast flux attacks if it left as- is. Is there Support (or even Agreement?) for any all of these three sentences instead …?

There is at least anectodal evidence that at least a few registrars and/or their resellers intentionally facilitate fast flux domain name exploits, particularly “double-flux” attacks. There is evidence that some registrars and/or their resellers have willfully ignored evidence that they are facilitating fast flux domain name exploits that were causing harm to the broader internet community. Many and perhaps most registrars take affirmative steps to ensure that they do not facilitate fast flux exploits, and also rapidly respond to information that they may be doing so without their knowledge.

Thanks,
Mike R.

From: owner-ntfy-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ntfy-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:54 AM
To: ntfy-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: REMINDER Fast Flux Conference Details Friday 14 November, 2008--16:00 UTC


------ Forwarded Message
From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:10:01 -0800
To: <ntfy-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: REMINDER Fast Flux Conference Details Friday 14 November, 2008--16:00 UTC



Dear All,

There will be a Fast Flux teleconference on Friday 14 November 2008 at 16:00 UTC

08:00 PST (California), 10:00 CST (Cedar Rapids), 11:00 EST (Washington DC), 16:00 (London), 17:00 CET (Brussels), 03:00 Melbourne next day.

Public WIKI workspace:
https://st.icann.org/pdp-wg-ff/index.cgi

Private WIKI workspace that only group members can read and edit
https://st.icann.org/fast-flux-wg/index.cgi?fast_flux_working_group

Dial-in details are below.

Thank you and let me know if you have any questions.
Kind regards,
Glen


Dial-in details:
PARTICIPANT PASSCODE: FF
For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call.

Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number

ARGENTINA 0800-777-0494 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4862 1-800-880-485 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0964 1-800-880-485 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1964 1-800-880-485 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7733 1-800-880-485 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5243 1-800-880-485 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8211-1386 1-800-880-485 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-89-654 0800-999-636 BELGIUM 32-2-402-2432 0800-4-8360 BRAZIL 0800-8912038 CHILE 1230-020-0281 CHINA* 86-400-810-4760 10800-712-1193 10800-120-1193 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156463 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-15 800-700-167
DENMARK                            45-7014-0238             8088-6075
FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-164 0-800-1-12056 FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-164 0-800-1-12056 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-75 080-511-1431 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-75 080-511-1431 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-75-00-04 080-511-1431 GERMANY 49-69-2222-52104 0800-216-1601 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0639 00800-12-5999 HONG KONG 852-2286-5632 800-964-136 HUNGARY 06-800-15227 INDIA 000-800-852-1216 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3500 IRELAND 353-1-246-0036 1800-931-782 ISRAEL 1-80-9303048 ITALY 39-02-3600-0326 800-906-585 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4763 00531-12-1149 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5154 00531-12-1149
LUXEMBOURG                         352-27-000-1314
MALAYSIA 1-800-80-8121 MEXICO 001-866-627-0541 NETHERLANDS 31-20-710-9321 0800-023-4655 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4641 0800-443-793
NORWAY                             47-21-59-00-14           800-11982
PANAMA 011-001-800-5072119 POLAND 00-800-1210067
PORTUGAL                                                    8008-12179
RUSSIA 8-10-8002-9613011 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9197 800-120-4057
SLOVAK REPUBLIC                    421-2-322-422-15
SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-93390 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1052 00798-14800-6323 SPAIN 34-91-414-15-44 800-099-279 SWEDEN 46-8-566-10-782 0200-887-612 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-7718 0800-000-038 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7346 00801-137-565 THAILAND 001-800-1206-65091 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9015 0800-018-0795 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3215 0800-018-0795 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2115 0800-018-0795 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7019-0812 0800-018-0795 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1415 0800-018-0795 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3439 USA 1-210-795-0472 877-818-6787 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3205 *Access to your conference call will be either of the numbers listed, dependent on the participants' local telecom provider.

Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org












------ End of Forwarded Message



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy