RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately

["Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Jose.  As per Friday's WG call, Martin is drafting a short appendix
to the initial report, to include some stats.  Martin, can you incorporate
Jose's notes below?
All best,
--Greg




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jose nazario
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 6:09 PM
To: gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Dave Piscitello'; 'Martin Hall'; 'Fast Flux
Workgroup'
Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately


On 11/20/08 11:58 AM, "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, these are useful basic stats.  Jose and Martin, do you have any
> objections to including the numbers in the report, and if not, how would
you
> describe your metrics?  (# fluxing domains observed, per day, over time,
> etc.)

I have no objections. Ours are "active" fast flux domains within any 24h
window; we wait 24h from the time that any name MAY have been parked or
discontinued to call it inactive.

> Each provider finds names, and decides which to monitor, in different ways
I
> am guessing.

Yes, discovery and qualification differ. We have described our metrics in a
paper from earlier this year.

Now to figure out why martin's numbers are so much higher than ours. :)
gotta improve our discovery.

-- jose