Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately

[Martin Hall <martinh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yep. I'm getting some updated numbers from our detectors and going to  
recommend a summary and some numbers.
Jose, I'm happy to coordinate this with you.

Martin
On Nov 24, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Greg Aaron wrote:

> Thanks, Jose.  As per Friday's WG call, Martin is drafting a short  
> appendix
> to the initial report, to include some stats.  Martin, can you  
> incorporate
> Jose's notes below?
> All best,
> --Greg
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jose nazario
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 6:09 PM
> To: gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Dave Piscitello'; 'Martin Hall'; 'Fast Flux
> Workgroup'
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
>
>
> On 11/20/08 11:58 AM, "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Yes, these are useful basic stats.  Jose and Martin, do you have any
> > objections to including the numbers in the report, and if not, how  
> > would
> you
> > describe your metrics?  (# fluxing domains observed, per day, over  
> > time,
> > etc.)
> I have no objections. Ours are "active" fast flux domains within any  
> 24h
> window; we wait 24h from the time that any name MAY have been parked  
> or
> discontinued to call it inactive.
>
> > Each provider finds names, and decides which to monitor, in  
> > different ways
> I
> > am guessing.
> Yes, discovery and qualification differ. We have described our  
> metrics in a
> paper from earlier this year.
>
> Now to figure out why martin's numbers are so much higher than  
> ours. :)
> gotta improve our discovery.
>
> -- jose
--
Martin Hall
skype: martin-hall
+1-408-838-2890