<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
- To: "'jose nazario'" <jose@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Martin Hall'" <martinh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
- From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:28:28 -0500
OK, just saw the below list of TLDs. Martin, did you see any TLDs other
than the below?
In the meantime I'll obtain recent domain-under-sponsorship numbers for
these TLDs.
VeriSign declines to release domain-under-sponsorship numbers for .CC and
.TV.
All best,
--Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: jose nazario [mailto:jose@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 1:34 AM
To: gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Martin Hall'
Cc: 'Dave Piscitello'; 'Fast Flux Workgroup'
Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
On 11/26/08 11:31 AM, "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Do you have breakdowns of the domains by TLD?
I do!
16745 com
6393 cn
470 net
399 org
177 uk
155 ru
86 tk
73 COM
52 su
38 biz
34 mobi
25 in
25 eu
22 name
22 cc
16 tv
15 ws
14 info
14 bz
13 kg
13 jp
12 us
12 gs
10 be
7 me
7 es
6 md
6 ca
6 asia
5 st
5 ec
4 ph
3 tw
3 cz
2 at
1 ua
1 li
1 it
1 fr
1 ch
This is even broader than this summer when thorsten and I did our paper.
Sheesh.
> There were large spikes on July 3 and October 8. Do you think those may
be
> due to changes in monitoring, or did the bad guys light up tons of domains
> around those dates?
Changes in monitoring/massive data imports etc. major finds by some people.
Do not take it as "wow the bad guys went ape* on those days!".
Hope this helps.
-------------------------------------------------------------
jose nazario, ph.d. <jose@xxxxxxxxx>
Arbor Networks www.arbornetworks.com
v: (734) 821 1427
PGP: 0x40A7BF94
-------------------------------------------------------------
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|