<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately -- additional
- To: "'Martin Hall'" <martinh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately -- additional
- From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:09:15 -0500
Dear Martin and Jose:
Oh -- I think the column D header should read "Fast-flux domains observed by
Arbor (March 3-Nov 26)". Is that correct?
Your numbers are for new (i.e. unique) fluxing domains, correct?
All best,
--Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Aaron [mailto:gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:53 AM
To: 'Martin Hall'; 'joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: 'gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
Dear Martin:
Great!
The number of .TW domains is: 387,407
BTW, we are using domain numbers as of July because that is the latest month
for which gTLD stats are available:
http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/monthly-reports/
All best,
--Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Hall [mailto:martinh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 7:59 AM
To: joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately
I've added our numbers for the past 3 months to Greg's spreadsheet.
I'm working separately on charting this and other data for a draft to
insert in the report.
We have rather a lot of data that's taking longer than expected to run
our complete analytics on.
Looking at the ff domains/tld with the per 10,000 perspective, we see
the following TLDs with 1 or more per 10,000:
cn 19.55 (24,171)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|