<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately -- additional
- To: "'Jose Nazario'" <jose@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately -- additional
- From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:25:33 -0500
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jose Nazario
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 10:13 AM
To: Greg Aaron
Cc: 'Martin Hall'; joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] fast flux numbers lately -- additional
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Greg Aaron wrote:
> Oh -- I think the column D header should read "Fast-flux domains
> observed by Arbor (March 3-Nov 26)". Is that correct?
yes
> Your numbers are for new (i.e. unique) fluxing domains, correct?
actually the numbers are the cumulative number of unique fflux domains we
detected by gTLD. the by date stuff was anotehr data set.
-------------------------------------------------------------
jose nazario, ph.d. <jose@xxxxxxxxx>
manager of security research arbor networks
v: (734) 821 1427 http://asert.arbor.net/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|