Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Data Annex for Report - First Draft

[Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>]

Some editorial nits on the Annex:

3: varies -> vary
3: the data provides -> each data set provides
4: one graphical perspective -> unique graphical perspectives
6: data -> data sets, is -> are
7: includes -> include
25: metrics -> metric

I think these are very valuable, thanks for filling in a gap we have all
struggled with. I suggest that each of the graphical depictions be
accompanied by a text explanation, as is the case with Fluxing Domains
Detected Proportionately by TLD. Since you put so much time and effort into
generating the graphs, I would be more than willing to write these if the WG
thinks they would add clarity.




On 12/4/08 11:14 PM  Dec 4, 2008, "Martin Hall" <martinh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> My apologies for this being so close to our call tomorrow. The amount
> of data our analytics had to run over was gigantic and took longer
> than anticipated.
>
> Based on conversations and suggestions to date, I've included 4 data
> visualizations for the 8/23 - 11/23 period:
> New Fluxing Domains Detected by Date
> Total Number of Fluxing Domains Detected by Date
> Total Number of Fluxing Domains by TLD
> Number of Fluxing Domains per 10,000 Registered Domains by TLD
>
> I'm happy to do the work to turn Jose's numbers into similar charts.
> But I'd like the group to tell me that the visualizations I've chosen
> look OK or discuss alternatives before I take the time to produce them
> for Arbor's data.
>
> I will also enhance this with additional narrative based on the input
> I get from the list and on tomorrow's call.
>
> In line with the APWG report, perhaps I should also include the raw #
> registered domains/TLD in here as well?
>
> Comments?
>
> Martin
>
>
> --
> Martin Hall
> skype: martin-hall
> +1-408-838-2890
>