RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Please review and respond - Fast Flux WG

["Diaz, Paul" <pdiaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I, too, have another commitment and will miss Friday's call.

I think Mike Rodenbaugh has offered some practical suggestions for ways
the FF WG can move forward, but will want the group to have more
detailed discussions before recommending "registrant verification, rapid
takedown procedures and other methods ...to mitigate the volume of
criminal behavior more generally."  Even within the Registration Abuse
Policies WG there's debate about the scope of its mandate.  This WG
should remain focused on FF exploits.

Regards, P

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jose Nazario
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 6:52 PM
To: Mike Rodenbaugh
Cc: 'Fast Flux Workgroup'
Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Please review and respond - Fast Flux
WG


i'll be misssing this week's call, on a flight across the atlantic.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
jose nazario, ph.d.             <jose@xxxxxxxxx>
manager of security research    arbor networks
v: (734) 821 1427               http://asert.arbor.net/