<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Line 256
- To: Fast Flux Workgroup <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Line 256
- From: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 06:41:40 -0700
I'm reading the the draft final version as I add my assigned action items.
Line 256 says:
The WG wishes to emphasize that fast flux needs better definition and more
research.
Does the WG still believe this is accurate? As written, does this undermine
or dismiss the efforts the report makes to distinguish volatile networking
from fast flux attack networks.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|