Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Line 256

[Jose Nazario <jose@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 4 May 2009, Dave Piscitello wrote:

> The WG wishes to emphasize that fast flux needs better definition and 
> more research.
> Does the WG still believe this is accurate? As written, does this 
> undermine or dismiss the efforts the report makes to distinguish 
> volatile networking from fast flux attack networks.
on the one hand i thikn the current definition is lacking in clarity as it 
tries to be precise, so the sentiment of this statement is something i 
agree with; on the other hand it does undermine the report.
i'm ok with whacking it.

-------------------------------------------------------------
jose nazario, ph.d.             <jose@xxxxxxxxx>
manager of security research    arbor networks
v: (734) 821 1427               http://asert.arbor.net/