[gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Updated FF documents posted on wiki for review

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

An updated version of the draft final report has been posted on the wiki 
(https://st.icann.org/pdp-wg-ff/index.cgi?fast_flux_pdp_wg) for your review. 
This latest draft includes the proposals received for incorporating comment 1a 
and category 2, 7 and 8, as well as other modifications and additions discussed 
on the mailing list. Please note that no recommendations have been received yet 
for category 3 (James), 4 (Rod/Dave), 5 (James) and 6 (Kal). In addition, a new 
chapter has been included that summarizes the public comments received.

Some other issues the group might want to review, as pointed out by Dave:

Line 269: o  Encourage ISPs to instrument their own networks;
(this makes no sense to me)

LINE 275: o  Establish guidelines for the use of specific techniques such as
very low TTL values;
(should this say "appropriate use"?)

326: What is needed to make these final conclusions rather than interim?

344: What is needed to choose among these for recommendations?

As noted before, the WG will need to pay special attention to section 5.8, 5.9 
and chapters 8 (previous 7) and 9 (previous 8) which will require additional 
review and modification. In addition, you will find the updated Fast Flux 
Public Comments Categorization document posted on the wiki.

With best regards,

Marika