<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] DRAFT text for Section 5.9
- To: "'Fast Flux Workgroup'" <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] DRAFT text for Section 5.9
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:37:40 -0700
Not necessarily. Innovation is not necessarily stifled by regulation.
Banks are heavily regulated, yet they are managing to innovate in mobile
spaces. If mobile operators had to get on a whitelist in order to use super
fast TTLs, I imagine they could live with that and be unaffected in their
future innovation (once they get whitelisted).
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Piscitello
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 7:23 AM
To: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Diaz, Paul; Fast Flux Workgroup
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] DRAFT text for Section 5.9
Mike, Don't the comments from Ran Atkinson regarding the adverse impact on
mobility applications if limits were imposed on TTLs support the claim?
On 6/2/09 9:59 AM Jun 2, 2009, "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I disagree that limits on TTL would impede innovation of volatile
networks.
> We have no indication of that from any source, as far as I recall. I
> think it is better to leave the first sentence, and expand upon it,
> rather than introduce a red herring argument.
>
> I suggest we delete that last sentence, and instead add a clause up front:
> "As explained in section 5.8, none of the possible options..."
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> Rodenbaugh Law
> 548 Market Street
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> +1.415.738.8087
> www.rodenbaugh.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Diaz, Paul
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 11:07 AM
> To: Fast Flux Workgroup
> Cc: Marika Konings
> Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] DRAFT text for Section 5.9
>
>
> Here is proposed text for Section 5.9 (which also would appear in the
> Executive Summary re: Charter Question #9. Please share
> edits/comments to the list for further discussion/approval at the next FF
WG call on June 3.
>
>
> Issue
> What would be the impact of these limitations, guidelines, or
> restrictions to product and service innovation?
>
>
> Response
> None of the possible options noted above were deemed appropriate or
> viable. Besides their technical or practical limitations, such
> limitations, guidelines or restrictions likely would impede the
> innovation of legitimate "volatile networks" that use short TTLs and
> frequent DNS record updates to deliver their beneficial products and
> services.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|