RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Comment References, Interim Conclusions and Next Steps
I have suggested edits to James rework of Secs 8/9, on attached. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh Rodenbaugh Law 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 +1.415.738.8087 www.rodenbaugh.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 1:40 PM To: marika konings; fast flux fast flux Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Comment References, Interim Conclusions and Next Steps Team: Apologies for the delay on these materials.My schedule got away from me beginning on Thursday, and so this task was pushed to the weekend. In any event, please find attached two separate documents. The first (spreadsheet) attaches references for the views of the WG on comments received in response to the Initial Report. Please note that these are in no way an attempt to re-categorize the comments. Instead, the goal is to find the smallest number of sections / topics that sufficiently address -all- comments. I have included some sample language for each topic (needs further word-smithing), which can be used individually or worked into the comment analysis summary. Next, I have made many changes to section 8 ("Interim Conclusions") and section 9 ("Next Steps"). Please note that if you believe the text does not accurately characterize the WG findings, or if there are significant omissions, we can work through these on our call next Wednesday. Thank you, J. Attachment:
FF-WG Interim Conclusions and Next Steps.doc
|