RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Comment References, Interim Conclusions and Next Steps

["Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike, I am not sure which edits are yours.  Can you give me an example of
your changes, so I can distinguish them from the others?  I think this doc
has edits by two or three hands?

All best,
--Greg

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 12:38 PM
To: 'fast flux fast flux'
Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Comment References, Interim Conclusions and
Next Steps

I have suggested edits to James rework of Secs 8/9, on attached.

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA  94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 1:40 PM
To: marika konings; fast flux fast flux
Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Comment References, Interim Conclusions and
Next Steps

Team:

Apologies for the delay on these materials.My schedule got away from me
beginning on Thursday, and so this task was pushed to the weekend.

In any event, please find attached two separate documents.  The first
(spreadsheet) attaches references for the views of the WG on comments
received in response to the Initial Report.  Please note that these are in
no way an attempt to re-categorize the comments.  Instead, the goal is to
find the smallest number of sections / topics that sufficiently address
-all- comments.  I have included some sample language for each topic (needs
further word-smithing), which can be used individually or worked into the
comment analysis summary.

Next, I have made many changes to section 8 ("Interim Conclusions") and
section 9 ("Next Steps"). Please note that if you believe the text does not
accurately characterize the WG findings, or if there are significant
omissions, we can work through these on our call next Wednesday.

Thank you,

J.