ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Final Report: Last Call for Edits

  • To: "'Fast Flux Fast Flux'" <gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Final Report: Last Call for Edits
  • From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:49:21 -0700

Thanks James.  I disagree with three Whereas clauses.  They add nothing to
the motion and can be misconstrued by uninformed readers:  

-- Whereas the Working Group, through its efforts, uncovered numerous
challenges relating to the definition of fast flux hosting, and
distinguishing characteristics between legitimate and illicit uses

This is true, but unnecessary for the motion, and unduly highlights this
difficulty rather than any of our successes.

-- Whereas the Working Group was unable to reach consensus on
recommendations for new consensus policy, or changes to existing GNSO

In fact, we did reach consensus on the notion that a Fast Flux Data
Reporting System should be explored, and it very well might be implemented
via Consensus Policy.

-- The next clause says the "Group has developed and broadly supports
recommendations for best practices."  That is not true, as we haven't
recommended any specific best practices.


Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA  94104

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 7:31 AM
To: Fast Flux Fast Flux
Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Final Report: Last Call for Edits


With tomorrow's deadline approaching, please take a last moment to review
the Draft Final Report (wiki link below) and Draft Council Motion


The final document will be closed for edits as of end of day WEDNESDAY,
5 AUG 2009.

Thank you,


 James M. Bladel

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy