RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Final Report: Last Call for Edits

["Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks James.  I disagree with three Whereas clauses.  They add nothing to
the motion and can be misconstrued by uninformed readers:  

-- Whereas the Working Group, through its efforts, uncovered numerous
challenges relating to the definition of fast flux hosting, and
distinguishing characteristics between legitimate and illicit uses

This is true, but unnecessary for the motion, and unduly highlights this
difficulty rather than any of our successes.

-- Whereas the Working Group was unable to reach consensus on
recommendations for new consensus policy, or changes to existing GNSO
policies;

In fact, we did reach consensus on the notion that a Fast Flux Data
Reporting System should be explored, and it very well might be implemented
via Consensus Policy.

-- The next clause says the "Group has developed and broadly supports
recommendations for best practices."  That is not true, as we haven't
recommended any specific best practices.

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA  94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 7:31 AM
To: Fast Flux Fast Flux
Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Final Report: Last Call for Edits

Team:

With tomorrow's deadline approaching, please take a last moment to review
the Draft Final Report (wiki link below) and Draft Council Motion
(attached).  

https://st.icann.org/pdp-wg-ff/index.cgi

The final document will be closed for edits as of end of day WEDNESDAY,
5 AUG 2009.

Thank you,

J.



________________________
 James M. Bladel
 GoDaddy.com
 
 jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx