Re: [gnso-frn-dt] For your review - updated FRN Report

[Paul Diaz <pdiaz@xxxxxxx>]

Great work as usual, Marika.

RE: DT Option for Next Steps #3 ("Add this issue to the upcoming PDP on the 
RAA"), do we have any sense of how long it may be before the "scoping 
conversations" yield an output?  If not (and/or if it's unlikely to happen in 
the near term), this should be noted as a 'con' for this option.

Otherwise, I think this is pretty much good to go.  If others DT members 
concur, perhaps we can coordinate our final edits on the list and forgo 
Thursday's (later than usual) call?  If we still need that call @ 2130 UTC, 
maybe we can keep it short?

Best, P


On Feb 27, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Marika Konings wrote:

Dear All,

Please find attached an updated version of the Fake Renewal Notices Report 
which reflects the discussion of our last meeting. Feel free to share any 
comments / edits you may have with the mailing list. One thing the DT may want 
to consider is whether it still make sense to have the options listed in order 
of preference, or, seeing that not all options are mutually exclusive and the 
recommendation is to put the report out for public comment first, whether it 
would make more sense to not to specifically say that it is in order of 
preference, but let the DT view for each option speak for itself.

With best regards,

Marika
<Fake Renewal Notices Report - Draft - 27 February 2012.doc>