[gnso-idn-wg] Comments on notes of 30 Jan

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

Re:

>  5.2 Support for a country’s rights to define strings for the  
> country name. Alternative view; to also accept a country’s  
> responsibility/right to approve any gTLD strings featuring its  
> particular script, if unique for that country. Alternative view; to  
> also acknowledge a country’s right to influence the definitions/ 
> tables of its scripts/languages. Alternative view; to require a  
> country’s support for a gTLD string in “its” script, in analogy  
> with the issue of geo-political names. Ancillary view: recognition  
> that countries’ rights are limited to their respective jurisdictions.


I am pretty sure I expressed the view that no such right existed and  
that ICANN defining any such right was inappropriate.

a.