<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule
- To: wrodger@xxxxxxxxx, tinwee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule
- From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:36:06 -0500
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P>I think the time in between these two calls is a problem for Alistair Dixon, one
of the BC reps. he is off line at the moment, so I'll let him provide the details on what
can work for him.</P>
<P> </P>
<P>I am flexible to do teh call at 5 a.m. EST, or up until later in the evening EST.
however, we do need to avoid times already taken by the Council, other WGs and the TFs.:-)
not just due to overlap among members of the WG but staff as well. </P>
<P>regards, Marilyn Cade<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #a0c6e5 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT:
0px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; FONT-FAMILY: tahoma,sans-serif">
<HR color=#a0c6e5 SIZE=1>
<DIV></DIV>From: <I>Will Rodger <wrodger@xxxxxxxxx></I><BR>To: <I>Tan Tin Wee <tinwee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></I><BR>CC: <I>Charles Shaban <cshaban@xxxxxxxx>, gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx, rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx</I><BR>Subject: <I>Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call
schedule</I><BR>Date: <I>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:22:50 -0500</I><BR>>Tan Tin Wee wrote:<BR>>>I support Charles' suggestion.<BR>>>Late night and 5am morning is tough for me.<BR>>><BR>>>bestrgds<BR>>>tin wee<BR>>><BR>>>Charles Shaban wrote:<BR>>>>Ram and
Colleagues:<BR>>>><BR>>>>I prefer a third option, one call 90 min. with a new timing (maybe<BR>>>>between the current two) weekly.<BR>><BR>><BR>>Strong agreement here -- I was going to suggest both, but didn't <BR>>want to seem too greedy. <g><BR>><BR>>Will<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></div></h!
tml>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|