ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-idn-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule

  • To: "'Charles Shaban'" <cshaban@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule
  • From: "Ram Mohan" <rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:38:16 -0500

Charles, all,
Nice try to keep the call at 90 minutes ... but I would like to point out
several challenges that make it an uphill task.

In spite of best efforts, calls usually start about 5-10 minutes into the
time period, and we spend a required 5-10 minutes on
administrative/reporting tasks, which leave us a scant hour+ to discuss
significant topics.

I realize that for many, these calls are a "necessary pain"; however it
seems unlikely that we will have enough time to engage in real discussions
on the calls that lead to decisions if we starve ourselves of time.

If we do go to a single call, then I will request that we allow 120 minutes;
of course, if we are talked out prior to that time, the calls will promptly
end.  Some of you may have noticed that I endeavor to have calls end close
to the scheduled time regardless of start time.

-Ram

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ram Mohan
e: rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx | m: +1.215.431.0958
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Charles Shaban
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 1:26 AM
To: rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule

Ram and Colleagues:

I prefer a third option, one call 90 min. with a new timing (maybe
between the current two) weekly.

Regards,

Charles 

<rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on Wednesday, February 07, 2007 at 1:30 AM
+0000 wrote:
>Several WG members suggest that we should collapse the paired calls
>into a
>single call each week so we can all focus with intensity on our
>discussion
>rather than attempting to reconcile discussion between the two calls.
>
>The original reason for the paired calls was to achieve momentum on
>our
>task.  I believe that we have achieved that goal.  I am open to
>collapsing
>the paired calls into a single call each week, with an alternating
>time
>schedule so that different parts of the world are inconvenienced
>each week.
>
>Please write in to the list your preference:
>1) Single weekly call, alternating between earlier & late time slots
>each
>week, each call now extending for 120 minutes (2 hours)
>2) Status quo (paired calls, each 90 minutes)
>
>Regards,
>-Ram





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy