RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule

["Yoav Keren" <yoav@xxxxxxxx>]

Ram. All,

I support Charles suggestion.
I also think the point Tina made, that it is hard to reach a consensus
across calls is a strong point made in favor of a 1 call schedule.

Yoav

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Charles Shaban
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:26 AM
To: rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call
schedule

Ram and Colleagues:

I prefer a third option, one call 90 min. with a new timing (maybe
between the current two) weekly.

Regards,

Charles 

<rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on Wednesday, February 07, 2007 at 1:30 AM
+0000 wrote:
>Several WG members suggest that we should collapse the paired calls
>into a
>single call each week so we can all focus with intensity on our
>discussion
>rather than attempting to reconcile discussion between the two calls.
>
>The original reason for the paired calls was to achieve momentum on
>our
>task.  I believe that we have achieved that goal.  I am open to
>collapsing
>the paired calls into a single call each week, with an alternating
>time
>schedule so that different parts of the world are inconvenienced
>each week.
>
>Please write in to the list your preference:
>1) Single weekly call, alternating between earlier & late time slots
>each
>week, each call now extending for 120 minutes (2 hours)
>2) Status quo (paired calls, each 90 minutes)
>
>Regards,
>-Ram