<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule
- To: <rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule
- From: "Tina Dam" <tina.dam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:18:37 +0100
My preference is definitely a single call...regardless of how much
time/when. Reason is that there is overlaps between the calls resulting in
not being possible to reach "consensus" when arguments for/against positions
are made across two calls. As such two calls that should be the same may end
up going in opposite directions.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ram Mohan
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:31 AM
> To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our
> call schedule
>
> Several WG members suggest that we should collapse the paired
> calls into a single call each week so we can all focus with
> intensity on our discussion rather than attempting to
> reconcile discussion between the two calls.
>
> The original reason for the paired calls was to achieve
> momentum on our task. I believe that we have achieved that
> goal. I am open to collapsing the paired calls into a single
> call each week, with an alternating time schedule so that
> different parts of the world are inconvenienced each week.
>
> Please write in to the list your preference:
> 1) Single weekly call, alternating between earlier & late
> time slots each week, each call now extending for 120 minutes
> (2 hours)
> 2) Status quo (paired calls, each 90 minutes)
>
> Regards,
> -Ram
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|