FW: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] GNSO Comments re. ccNSO/GAC IDN Issues Report
Thank you very much Olof. The changes are highlighted in the attached file, version 2 of the summary. Please let me know if I made them correctly. Does anyone else in the ad-hoc group have any feedback regarding the summary? Chuck Gomes "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." ________________________________ From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 6:10 AM To: Gomes, Chuck Subject: RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] GNSO Comments re. ccNSO/GAC IDN Issues Report Hi Chuck, First class summary! Two suggestions: 1. It would be appropriate, I think, to reference also the Board resolution as a prompt for the response - in the first para under Working Group Information and/or under Purpose in Document Overview (both on the first page). 2. I find the first sentence of the B.2 statement (page 2) quite complex (= I don't get it, really...;-). Perhaps shorten it to just "IDN ccTLDs operated as non-territory linked de facto IDN gTLDs should be avoided to pre-empt unnecessary controversy regarding the blurred interface between gTLDs and ccTLDs. Just my two Euro-cents. Best regards Olof ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: den 12 september 2007 01:22 To: gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] GNSO Comments re. ccNSO/GAC IDN Issues Report I am tasked with providing a summary of the draft comments we prepared regarding the ccNSO/GAC IDN Issues Report to the Council in the Council meeting on 20 September. To accomplish that I prepared the attached document. My intent would be to go through this document fairly thoroughly, I assume without discussion because only 30 minutes are allotted on the agenda. Discussing will occur later, probably in the in-person Council meetings in L.A.; a two hour slot has tentatively been scheduled for around 3 pm on Saturday, 27 October. This will be a meeting open to observers if you are interested in attending. I am sending this to all of you as members of the ad-hoc group for your review and comment. I would also like to know if any of you who are not on the Council would like to listen to the Council meeting when this is discussed on 20 September. Please let me know this week so I can ask Glen to make arrangements. Any feedback you have is welcome. Chuck Gomes "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." Attachment:
ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDNs - Summary of GNSO Draft Comments v2.doc
|