Re: [gnso-idng] Draft Charter for an IDNG WG

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Guys,

Just to let you know that as discussed on the call, I am seeking more input
from the RrC on this topic.

I will report back to the team when possible.

Thanks,

Stéphane


Le 21/05/09 07:09, « Adrian Kinderis » <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> Team, where are we at?
> 
> I have just read the transcript and am keen for a discussion on the topic.
> 
> When are we next meeting (teleconference again?)?
> 
> Hopefully in hours that are conducive to AEST.
> 
> To preview my feelings on the group;
> 
> What is the difference between an IDN gTLD and an ASCII gTLD and why would it
> be sufficient to require a fast track? Just because they are different scripts
> doesn't mean they don't suffer the same issues with trademark infringement etc
> that new ASCII gTLD are currently managing.
> 
> IDN ccTLD are able to fast track because they are able to define their area
> from an existing list (and are finite). The same could not be said for IDN
> gTLD's.
> 
> I would have more preference for a geo TLD fast track as there is a finite
> groups and ICANN staff (and GNSO Council) have done well to define the rules
> and restrictions around their take up.
> 
> Anyway, just a few thought to get the ball rolling.
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2009 5:12 AM
> To: Edmon Chung; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Draft Charter for an IDNG WG
> 
> Thanks Edmon.  I made a few edits that are highlighted in the attached file.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 7:53 AM
>> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [gnso-idng] Draft Charter for an IDNG WG
>> 
>> Hi Everyone,
>> 
>> Based on the discussion so far, and appropriating much from the IDNC
>> Charter (for your easy reference:
>> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idnc-charter.htm),
>> please find attached a draft charter for an IDNG WG.
>> 
>> Basically, have incorporated the discussion we had regarding:
>> 1. Purpose
>> 2. Scope
>> 3. Process
>> 4. Membership
>> 
>> And added
>> 5. Timeline
>> 6. Background & References
>> 
>> Perhaps we should try to organize a conference call to talk about the
>> document sometime next week...
>> 
>> Edmon
>> 
>> 
>> PS. Glen, would it be possible to help try to coordinate a possible
>> call (for ~1.5hrs) for next week... My own availability are as
>> follows:
>> Mon/Tue/Fri between 1100-1500ET (1500-1900UTC)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>