RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG)
Thanks Edmon. I made some suggested edits that are highlighted in the attached file. Note that I avoided the use of the word 'policy' because both SO's have policy development processes that are different than this proposed approach. Also, I suggested at the end that the charter should contain a timeline/project plan. Because this is a joint WG, both SO's should probably approve the charter. A first step would be to make sure that ccNSO reps review and comment on the draft charter. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 5:20 AM > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG) > > Hi Everyone, > > After some further discussion with Jane of CCNSO, please find > attached a draft of the charter for the JIG. > > As mentioned earlier, the purpose would be to discuss and > provide implementation and policy recommendations to ICANN > regarding issues of common interest between IDN ccTLDs and IDN gTLDs. > > 2 particular conceptual features of the JIG would be: > 1. that if either SO feel that an issue is out of scope its > unilateral understanding would put the issue out of scope for > the JIG 2. that it is ongoing and will produce > recommendations for each SO's council to consider from time to time > > And of course, as mentioned earlier as well, we will start > with the following: > - IDN TLD length > - Variant management for TLD strings > - IDN Language table implementation at the root > > Thoughts and comments welcome... > > If we feel that this looks right, would also like to prepare > a resolution for the council to vote on at our upcoming > meeting (Jane will be doing the same at the CCNSO). > > Edmon > > > Attachment:
JIG-charter-DRAFT with Gomes edits 13 Jul 09.docx
|