RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is not about IDN Variants (which has to do with IDN language
tables/policies).

Adrian, yes, that is what this is attempting to achieve. The DAG right now
is not clear on the issue.

Edmon



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> Of Adrian Kinderis
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:35 PM
> To: Stéphane Van Gelder; icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Edmon Chung'; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> 
> 
> An existing TLD that wants the IDN equivalent won't get knocked back
because it is
> confusingly similar (i.e. The applicant is the same entity as the existing
gtld registry).
> 
> I think...
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2010 8:28 PM
> To: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Edmon Chung'; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> 
> 
> Are we not talking about the variants here? If so, variants have already
been
> included in the updated documents staff provided for Nairobi.
> 
> If we're not talking about variants, please explain what we are talking
about.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 14 avr. 2010 à 03:53, Mike Rodenbaugh a écrit :
> 
> >
> > Thanks Edmon.  I am good with the draft, but wonder if we have consensus
to go
> one step further and make a recommendation to Council, asking Council to
ask
> Staff to revise the DAG to clarify that multiple 'confusingly similar'
applications by
> the same applicant would not contend with one another.  I support that
> recommendation, and wonder whether there is any opposition in this group?
> >
> > Best,
> > Mike
> >
> > Mike Rodenbaugh
> > RODENBAUGH LAW
> > tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
> > http://rodenbaugh.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 12:10 AM
> > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Given no further discussions on the 2 topics that were identified:
> >
> > 1. Application of confusingly similar TLD strings
> >     - there seems to be enough agreement around this topic in general
> >     - also attached clean version of the document
> >
> > 2. Process for the application of IDN gTLDs, including those identified
in 1
> >     - there continues to be push back against having any dedicated
process to
> handle special case IDN TLD applications
> >
> > And given that it seems any further discussion would require the GNSO
council to
> consider whether an actual working group should be formed for further work
on 1 (if
> any) unless there is any particular objection, I will report the above
back to the
> council.
> >
> > Edmon
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2807 - Release Date: 04/14/10
04:22:00