RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Adrian,

I think that should be the case but it is not clear to me that the DAG is clear 
about that.  I think it would be good to be explicit about that.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:35 AM
> To: Stéphane Van Gelder; icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Edmon Chung'; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> 
> 
> An existing TLD that wants the IDN equivalent won't get 
> knocked back because it is confusingly similar (i.e. The 
> applicant is the same entity as the existing gtld registry).
> 
> I think...
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2010 8:28 PM
> To: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Edmon Chung'; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> 
> 
> Are we not talking about the variants here? If so, variants 
> have already been included in the updated documents staff 
> provided for Nairobi.
> 
> If we're not talking about variants, please explain what we 
> are talking about.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 14 avr. 2010 à 03:53, Mike Rodenbaugh a écrit :
> 
> > 
> > Thanks Edmon.  I am good with the draft, but wonder if we 
> have consensus to go one step further and make a 
> recommendation to Council, asking Council to ask Staff to 
> revise the DAG to clarify that multiple 'confusingly similar' 
> applications by the same applicant would not contend with one 
> another.  I support that recommendation, and wonder whether 
> there is any opposition in this group?
> > 
> > Best,
> > Mike
> > 
> > Mike Rodenbaugh
> > RODENBAUGH LAW
> > tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
> > http://rodenbaugh.com
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> > Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 12:10 AM
> > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
> > 
> > Hi Everyone,
> > 
> > Given no further discussions on the 2 topics that were identified:
> > 
> > 1. Application of confusingly similar TLD strings
> >     - there seems to be enough agreement around this topic 
> in general
> >     - also attached clean version of the document
> > 
> > 2. Process for the application of IDN gTLDs, including 
> those identified in 1
> >     - there continues to be push back against having any dedicated 
> > process to handle special case IDN TLD applications
> > 
> > And given that it seems any further discussion would 
> require the GNSO council to consider whether an actual 
> working group should be formed for further work on 1 (if any) 
> unless there is any particular objection, I will report the 
> above back to the council.
> > 
> > Edmon
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>