<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
- To: "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:49:09 -0400
Eric,
Are you suggesting that Edmon's report to the Council should be changed?
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:36 AM
> To: Edmon Chung
> Cc: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] reporting back to the council
>
>
> Edmon,
>
> We did not reach consensus that the Council's prior position
> the timing of ccTLD IDNs and gTLD IDNs ment that even one
> gTLD IDN should be considered before all new gTLDs should be
> considered.
>
> I think it is reasonable to inform the Council that its prior
> position can't be unambiguously interpreted by the members of
> the drafting team. They may choose to clarify.
>
> We did not reach consensus on what examples to place within a
> report to the Council.
>
> I think it is reasonable to inform the Council that work
> stopped over choice of example.
>
> We also came to an unexpected halt in mid-December, with
> nothing of substance subsequent.
>
> That is, I think it prudent to go public that there were
> process issues which appear to have had some influence on the
> abilities of the drafting team to draft what you are
> attempting to draft as a report of limited progress.
>
> Eric
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|