RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well done Avri.  Thanks.

I made two very minor edits and two other edits that I think are needed.
They are highlighted in the attached file.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended 
> evaluation.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following yesterday's meeting, where the 3 of us in 
> attendance decided to propose a motion for a letter to be 
> sent to the implementation team requesting the addition of an 
> Extended Evaluation for strings that fail the Initial 
> Evaluation, I volunteered to write up a draft of such a motion.
> 
> I have attached that draft - which combines Chucks work with 
> my original draft of a letter and hopefully also incorporates 
> the sense of the WG relating to the extensive discussions on 
> creation of a WG.
> 
> As always, ready to edit till we get it right,
> 
> a.
> 
>

Attachment: idng-letter-motion-4-extended-eval with Gomes edits.doc
Description: idng-letter-motion-4-extended-eval with Gomes edits.doc