[gnso-igo-ingo-adm] RE: Pending work items

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Avri/Mary,

In looking at v.1.7 of the spreadsheet, I could only find a comment added from 
the IOC.  Am I correct on that?  If so, there comment seems to me to be fairly 
easy to handle.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:31 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Mary Wong; gnso-igo-ingo-adm@xxxxxxxxx; Berry Cobb
> Subject: Re: Pending work items
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I agree.
> 
> But at least we now know what we need to do.  I do not think we have
> the biggest most important issues at the moment.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 09:42, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > At this late stage,  I don't think we have time to do more than defer
> to the coming week.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:31 AM
> >> To: Mary Wong; Gomes, Chuck
> >> Cc: gnso-igo-ingo-adm@xxxxxxxxx; Berry Cobb
> >> Subject: Re: Pending work items
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Tried using the list yesterday, but then noticed I never got the
> >> message and thus you probably didn't either.
> >>
> >> avri
> >>
> >> On 15 Jan 2013, at 17:48, Avri Doria wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> We have work items pending from last week.
> >>>
> >>> - Integrate RCRC stuff
> >>> - come up with some suggestions for way to figure out the magnitude
> >> of the various numbers included in the questions.
> >>> - come up with suggestions for way to figure out the of the sort of
> >> metrics
> >>>
> >>> Suggestions.
> >>>
> >>> I have no problem telling the group we have not worked on it at
> >> tomorrow's meeting.  But if anyone has thoughts, better.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> avri
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >