Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO PDP WG Action Items

[Cintra Sooknanan <cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry there was an internet phone and cable disruption on my end toward the
end of the call.

I'll have to revert to the transcript record as well.

Regards

Cintra Sooknanan

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> On 31 Oct 2012, at 20:39, Brian Peck wrote:
>
> > <IGO-INGO_WG_WorkPlan_07NOV2012.doc>
>
>
> As I indicated in my previous note where sent apologies due to conflict:
>
> > One request I would like to make on the issues up-front is that the work
> items include doing impact analysis (rights, competition etc) on any
> recommendations made.
> > I know this is in the defined PDP process, but many of the elements of
> the PDP are, for example the process to be used, yet we repeat them in the
> charters of WG.  Until such time as impact analysis (rights, competition
> etc..) is an understood and expect element that needs no mention, I beleive
> it is critical that it be mentioned.
> >
> > In this case I expect that impact analysis goes beyond pro-forma but is
> substantive given the arguments of the RCRC and others related to to
> humanitarian principles, human rights and international law.
>
> I will try to listen to the recording to understand why this request was
> rejected.
>
> In the meantime I request that the following be aded to the Mission and
> Scope under elements for the final Report
>
> - Impact analysis, including rights, competition and other , for any
> recommendations made by the WG.
>
> thanks
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
>
>
>