Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] FW: Proposed language edit for the WG charter

["David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>]

+1
David W. Maher
Senior Vice President – Law & Policy
Public Interest Registry
312 375 4849

From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:evan@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:45:48 -0500
To: RICARDO GUILHERME 
<ricardo.GUILHERME@xxxxxxx<mailto:ricardo.GUILHERME@xxxxxxx>>
Cc: ALAN GREENBERG <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
THOMAS RICKERT <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>>, David Maher 
<dmaher@xxxxxxx<mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx>>, Brian Peck 
<brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>>, Margie Milam 
<Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>>, Berry Cobb 
<mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, KEN STUBBS 
<kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] FW: Proposed language edit for the WG charter

On 15 November 2012 11:29, GUILHERME ricardo 
<ricardo.GUILHERME@xxxxxxx<mailto:ricardo.GUILHERME@xxxxxxx>> wrote:

In other words, the Charter is already determining that, EVEN if the PDP 
concludes AGAINST permanent protection, it would still have to develop 
“specific recommendations for appropriate special protections for these names.”


By my interpretation, the specific recommendation could (and must have the 
option to) propose that the appropriate special protection is "none".

- Evan