Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] FW: Proposed language edit for the WG charter

[Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

+ 1.


On Nov 15, 2012, at 8:47 AM, "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> +1
> David W. Maher
> Senior Vice President – Law & Policy
> Public Interest Registry
> 312 375 4849
> 
> From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:evan@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:45:48 -0500
> To: RICARDO GUILHERME 
> <ricardo.GUILHERME@xxxxxxx<mailto:ricardo.GUILHERME@xxxxxxx>>
> Cc: ALAN GREENBERG 
> <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>>, THOMAS RICKERT 
> <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
> "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>" 
> <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>>, David Maher 
> <dmaher@xxxxxxx<mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx>>, Brian Peck 
> <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>>, Margie Milam 
> <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>>, Berry Cobb 
> <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, KEN STUBBS 
> <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] FW: Proposed language edit for the WG charter
> 
> On 15 November 2012 11:29, GUILHERME ricardo 
> <ricardo.GUILHERME@xxxxxxx<mailto:ricardo.GUILHERME@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
> In other words, the Charter is already determining that, EVEN if the PDP 
> concludes AGAINST permanent protection, it would still have to develop 
> “specific recommendations for appropriate special protections for these 
> names.”
> 
> 
> By my interpretation, the specific recommendation could (and must have the 
> option to) propose that the appropriate special protection is "none".
> 
> - Evan
> 
> 
> 
>