RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] SG/C Request for Input v0.4

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Berry.

The first key element of the charter says: "Quantifying the Entities whose 
names[ICRC1]  should be Considered for Special Protection ".  Is there a reason 
why we say 'quantifying' instead of 'identifying'?  Is this the way it is 
worded in the charter?  The reason I ask is this: knowing how many there are 
(i.e., quantifying) would be good information to have but doing that without 
identifying the organizations might not be very helpful unless we define 
precise criteria without naming organizations, which would be okay in my 
opinion.  Maybe we should say "quantifying and/or identifying as applicable".

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 6:14 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] SG/C Request for Input v0.4

Team,

Attached is the latest version (redline & clean) of the SG & C input request 
template.  Please send any other suggested changes to the list and I will 
incorporate into the master.  We will review this at our next meeting on 
Wednesday 5 DEC @ 19:00 UTC.

Thank you.  B

Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb


________________________________

 [ICRC1]We would recommend that it be made clear throughout the document that 
the protection is sought/intended for designations and not for the 
organizations themselves. This is especially necessary as, as outlined on the 
call the Red Cross, Red Crescent and Red Crystal designations and related names 
enjoy international protection primarily as the names of the distinctive 
protective emblems of armed forces medical personnel in times of armed conflict 
and only as a second ground as the names of the respective Red Cross and Red 
Crescent organizations.