Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO Work Tool based on the straw man

[Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

David,
this is great news! 

Thanks,
Thomas

=============
thomas-rickert.tel
+49.228.74.898.0

Am 10.12.2012 um 21:58 schrieb "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>:

> I volunteer for the Protections package.
> David W. Maher
> Senior Vice President – Law & Policy
> Public Interest Registry
> 312 375 4849
> 
> From: THOMAS RICKERT <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:57:22 -0500
> To: "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>" 
> <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO Work Tool based on the straw man
> 
> Colleagues,
> please find attached an operationalized version of the straw man.
> 
> In the Excel sheet, you find 5 spreadsheets in total, one for each area of 
> work. Hopefully, we will be able to find one volunteer per spreadsheet. 
> Please indicate on the mailing list or during the next call whether you would 
> be willing to take care of one of the Work Packages.
> 
> In order to give you an idea of how the tool can be used, I have filled in 
> some information in the file tagged "example". What I have added is taken 
> from previous discussions and just for purposes of illustration. It does not 
> reflect my personal view and shall not prejudice the outcome of our work. 
> Please feel free to delete / amend as you deem appropriate or use the clean 
> version as the basis of your work. Also, the list of factors is not 
> exhaustive.
> 
> As far as next steps are concerned, I propose we proceed as outlined below. I 
> know the plan is ambitious, but we should try to enable the GNSO Council to 
> meet the January deadline. Certainly, the plan is subject to our discussion 
> on Wednesday.
> 
> During our call this week, I would like to go through the spreadsheets and 
> let the group add / amend points and instant feedback. The question will be 
> whether all options / questions are included the sheets.
> 
> We should then create subgroups that work with the respective volunteers to 
> aggregate information (including links to supporting documentation), discuss 
> the various items and make a (provisional) recommendation as to how to deal 
> with the various issues) before the whole group reconvenes to discuss 
> (interim) results and progress during its Dec. 19<x-apple-data-detectors://0> 
> meeting. We should continue discussing this on the mailing list.
> 
> Together with staff, I will try to have an interim report ready for the Jan 
> 9th<x-apple-data-detectors://1> meeting. That should give us an indication on 
> which areas are controversial and where consensus might be reached. We should 
> continue our discussion on the mailing list and refine the groups view. I 
> would then be able to propose to the Council Leadership to present our 
> preliminary findings during the January 17th<x-apple-data-detectors://2> call.
> 
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> 
> =============
> thomas-rickert.tel
> +49.228.74.898.0
>