[gnso-igo-ingo] "and"

["Claudia MACMASTER TAMARIT" <MACMASTER@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Thomas and all,

As discussed, a few quick lines on the question of the meaning of "and" in the 
Resolution.

Resolved, the GNSO hereby initiates a PDP to evaluate (ii) whether there is a 
need for special protections at the top and second level in all gTLDs for the 
names of the following types of international organizations: International 
Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and international non-governmental 
organizations (INGOs) receiving protections under treaties and statutes under 
multiple jurisdictions, and specifically including the Red Cross/Red Crescent 
Movement (RCRC) and the International Olympic Committee (IOC), and (ii) if so, 
to develop policy recommendations for such protections.

Does the highlighted "and" mean;


a)       international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) receiving 
protections under treaties and [INGOs receiving protections] under statutes 
under multiple jurisdictions (graphically represented below), OR

[cid:image006.png@01CDDE3A.319AF240][cid:image008.png@01CDDE3A.319AF240][and][cid:image011.png@01CDDE3A.319AF240]


b)      international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) receiving 
protections [both] under treaties and [also] under statutes under multiple 
jurisdictions (graphically represented below)?
[and][cid:image014.png@01CDDE3A.319AF240][cid:image015.png@01CDDE3A.319AF240]

If the answer is B, as already signaled by the Unredacted version of Board 
Workshop Paper on IOC/Red Cross Protections Released on 28 August 2012, few 
organizations may qualify and  other international organizations of 
"extraordinary reach and public service" may be unfairly excluded.

Happy to provide more if necessary.

Thanks,
Claudia

Attachment: image009.emz
Description:

Attachment: image012.emz
Description: