RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] "and"

[<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

To the extent that the Council's intent was to utilize the same
justification/basis as was done for the IOC/IFRC by the GAC, I agree
with Chuck.

Then again, I suppose it is not necessarily out of bounds for the WG to
determine if there may be sufficient reason to at least flag (if not
investigate, for lack of time/charter or whatever) the possibility that
some INGOs may *not* fulfill both criteria but nonetheless may have
compelling reasons/basis for similar protections.

Cheers
Mary

Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584  

>>> "Gomes, Chuck"  12/19/12 6:35 PM >>>
<!--/* Font Definitions */@font-face{font-family:"Cambria
Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2
4;}@font-face{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2
4;}@font-face{font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}/* Style
Definitions */p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal,
div.MsoNormal{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}a:link,
span.MsoHyperlink{mso-style-priority:99;color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}a:visited,
span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed{mso-style-priority:99;color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}p.MsoAcetate,
li.MsoAcetate,
div.MsoAcetate{mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-link:"Balloon Text
Char";margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}p.MsoListParagraph,
li.MsoListParagraph,
div.MsoListParagraph{mso-style-priority:34;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}span.BalloonTextChar{mso-style-name:"Balloon
Text Char";mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-link:"Balloon
Text";font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}span.EmailStyle20{mso-style-type:personal;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext;}span.EmailStyle21{mso-style-type:personal;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;}span.EmailStyle22{mso-style-type:personal-reply;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;}.MsoChpDefault{mso-style-type:export-only;font-size:10.0pt;}@page
WordSection1{size:8.5in 11.0in;margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt
70.85pt;}div.WordSection1{page:WordSection1;}/* List Definitions */@list
l0{mso-list-id:596451807;mso-list-type:hybrid;mso-list-template-ids:1662051702
67698711 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713
67698715;}@list
l0:level1{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;mso-level-text:"%1\)";mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:left;text-indent:-.25in;}@list
l0:level2{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:left;text-indent:-.25in;}@list
l0:level3{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:right;text-indent:-9.0pt;}@list
l0:level4{mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:left;text-indent:-.25in;}@list
l0:level5{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:left;text-indent:-.25in;}@list
l0:level6{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:right;text-indent:-9.0pt;}@list
l0:level7{mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:left;text-indent:-.25in;}@list
l0:level8{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:left;text-indent:-.25in;}@list
l0:level9{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;mso-level-tab-stop:none;mso-level-number-position:right;text-indent:-9.0pt;}ol{margin-bottom:0in;}ul{margin-bottom:0in;}-->I
cannot give the official word but I believe it is b not only based on
the motion wording but also based on the history to date regarding the
IOC/RCRC and the GAC communications.
 
Chuck
 
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Claudia MACMASTER
TAMARIT
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:43 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx; Thomas Rickert (rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] "and"


 
Hi Thomas and all,
 
As discussed, a few quick lines on the question of the meaning of *and*
in the Resolution.
 
Resolved, the GNSO hereby initiates a PDP to evaluate (ii) whether there
is a need for special protections at the top and second level in all
gTLDs for the names of the following types of international
organizations: International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and
international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) receiving
protections under treatiesand statutes under multiple jurisdictions, and
specifically including the Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement (RCRC) and
the International Olympic Committee (IOC), and (ii) if so, to develop
policy recommendations for such protections.
 
Does the highlighted *and* mean;
 
a)      international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) receiving
protections under treaties and[INGOs receiving protections] under
statutes under multiple jurisdictions (graphically represented below),
OR

 
b)     international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) receiving
protections[both] under treaties and [also] under statutes under
multiple jurisdictions(graphically represented below)?

 
If the answer is B, as already signaled by the Unredacted version of
Board Workshop Paper on IOC/Red Cross Protections Released on 28 August
2012, few organizations may qualify and  other international
organizations of *extraordinary reach and public service* may be
unfairly excluded.
 
Happy to provide more if necessary.
 
Thanks, 
Claudia