Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be considered

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 23 Jan 2013, at 12:30, GUILHERME ricardo wrote:

> However, it is impossible to accept blanket WG statements that there is “no 
> opposition to making the RPMs available to all users of the DNS” – at the 
> very least, we (as part of the wider IGO community) have always expressed our 
> complete opposition to curative mechanisms as a matter of principle for the 
> legal, objective and practical reasons already expressed in various 
> submissions, as well as in the light of the fact that IGOs, which are 
> subjects of international law bound by a specific regime of privileges and 
> immunities, are NOT subject to national jurisdictions and are NOT dependent 
> on trademark registration for the protection of their names and acronyms.
>  

Making one comment:

the idea was to expand the criteria under which the RPMs might be used beyond 
TM to server IGO/INGO needs.


Checking on thing:

I understand that you object to RPMs being the only remedy.
Do you actually object to them being one remedy?


avri