RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization Survey / Domain Registration Analysis

["Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chuck,

 

They can be found on the Wiki:

https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175441 

 

B

 

Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

 <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

@berrycobb

 

 

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 14:43
To: Thomas Rickert
Cc: Berry Cobb; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization Survey / Domain Registration
Analysis

 

Are the SG statements to the WG posted somewhere on the ICANN website or
wiki?  If so, where?

 

Chuck

 

From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 10:46 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Berry Cobb; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization Survey / Domain Registration
Analysis

 

Hello Chuck,

that was the idea. 

 

Thanks,

Thomas

 

 

 

 

 

Am 26.01.2013 um 22:24 schrieb "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

 

Is the expectation that the organizations that want protection would provide
the data?

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:17 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization Survey / Domain Registration
Analysis

 

Team,

 

Attached is a spreadsheet evolved from the analysis started by Alan
Greenberg and supported by other in the WG that should be performed to
further define the nature of the problem.  At this stage, we are looking for
the WG to comment on this approach before we continue "filling in the
blanks."  If the WG agrees with this approach, we can then discuss a divide
and conquer strategy to complete the analysis.

 

A few notes about the SS:

 

1.          The 1st tab, "data_gather_form" is a list of the items Alan
suggested we request information from organizations seeking protection.
Other WG members seemed to agree with this list of questions.  I'd like to
ask the WG to review and recommend additional types of information that we
should possibly request.  A possible tool to solicit this feedback from the
organizations is to construct a survey and distribute to organizations
identified for completion.  ICANN has deployed a survey tool (LimeSurvey)
that may benefit this exercise ( <https://limesurvey.icann.org/>
https://limesurvey.icann.org/), and it may aid in generating useful
statistics to aid in the analysis.

2.          The 2nd tab, "registration_by_org_by_tld" is a matrix evolved
from the analysis performed by Alan, and it also includes responses
submitted by the IOC.  Several notes about this framework:

a.          The organizations listed here are the organizations list in the
13DEC11 letter to ICANN signed by NGOs.  It also includes UNICEF (from
Alan's PDF analysis) that was not a signatory of the letter.

b.          Not all identifiers from the IOC and RCRC are included at this
point.  We can add them to this analysis after we agree to the approach.

c.          I only completed the IOC identifiers as a working example.  As
you will see we have much more to complete once finalized.

d.          Countrycodes listed next to the TLDs are not all inclusive, but
I attempted to pick the larger ccTLDs.  We can add others as necessary.

e.          The remainder of TLD types are divided by generic,
generic-restricted, and sponsored as defined by IANA Root Zone dB

f.           Cells with Green Fill and White letters are an indication that
the site may have legitimate use, as first identified by Alan

g.          We may want to further define meta-tags for domains that are
registered, but not controlled by the respective organization (i.e. do we
tag by malicious use, monetary gain, for sale, etc..)

h.          Stats at the bottom of the chart for each organization are meant
to:

.            Determine total % of identifier domains as registered across
the various TLDs

.            Then a % of domains registered as a breakout of TLD type

.            Each is compared alongside as to whether the respective org has
control of the domain or not

 

We welcome your input to this tool.  Please provide feedback over the list,
and we will discuss this approach at our meeting next week.

 

Thank you.  B

 

Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

 <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

@berrycobb