<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Nature of the problem / Evidence of harm discussion
- To: "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Nature of the problem / Evidence of harm discussion
- From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:41:37 +0100
All,
some of you have responded to the below e-mail. May I ask those who have not
done so yet to please respond?
Thanks,
Thomas
Am 07.02.2013 um 21:18 schrieb Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> All,
> following up on yesterday's call I would like to ask all of you to answer
> either of the following questions. As you will remember, there was some
> debate surrounding the question if and what evidence of harm needs to be
> presented to the group and Chuck proposed the following questions, which I
> have modified a bit:
>
> 1. Are there those who want to see evidence of harm before considering
> granting protections?
>
> 2. Are there those who are requiring protections who are unwilling to provide
> information? If so, are you offering other or a subset of the information
> required according to the survey sheet.
>
> Please answer the question by next Tuesday.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|