Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Deadlines in New gTLD Committee Resolution on IGO names

["Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is much more likely a failure of implementation than a failure of interest.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device


From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 02:25 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Deadlines in New gTLD Committee Resolution on IGO 
names

If indeed no IGOs have applied for such protection in this round, I find that a 
substantive fact that the WG must consider when looking at whether and what 
permanent protections are required.

Alan

At 06/03/2013 02:10 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
Thanks for this, Brian.

Luckily, my memory did not fail me :-).

Thomas


Am 06.03.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Brian Peck 
<brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx> >:

As a follow-up to our discussion at the end of the call on the 26 November 
Resolution regarding the protection of IGO names at the second level of the 
first round of new gTLDs, the 28 Feb. 2013 deadline was for both the GNSO to 
provide advice as well as for IGOs to apply to ICANN to be listed on the 
reserved names list.  The language is provided below, the entire resolution and 
rationale can be found at:

http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-26nov12-en.htm#1.b

Thanks.

Best Regards,

Brian

Brian Peck
Policy Director
ICANN

RESOLVED (2012.11.26.NG02), the Board requests that the GNSO Council advise the 
Board by no later than 28 February 2013 if it is aware of any concern such as 
with the global public interest or the security or stability of the DNS, that 
the Board should take into account in making its decision about whether to 
include second level protections for certain IGO names and acronyms by 
inclusion on a Reserved Names List in section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant 
Guidebook, applicable in all new gTLD registries approved in the first round of 
the New gTLD Program. The specific IGO names to be protected shall be those 
names or acronyms that: 1) qualify under the current existing criteria to 
register a domain name in the .int gTLD; and 2) have a registered .int domain 
OR a determination of eligibility under the .int criteria; and 3) apply to 
ICANN to be listed on the reserved names list for the second level prior to the 
delegation of any new gTLDs by no later than 28 February 2013.



* * *

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may 
well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice 
of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete 
this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any 
purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your 
cooperation.

* * *

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that, 
unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in 
this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended or written to 
be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under 
the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2) 
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters 
addressed herein.

Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00