ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Compiled Responses for Protections Matrix

  • To: "'Shatan, Gregory S.'" <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Berry Cobb'" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Compiled Responses for Protections Matrix
  • From: <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:03:36 -0700

Greg, you should be more specific.  You put out a call for consensus in the IPC 
yesterday.  You have received six responses, including from the other two IPC 
members of the working group (David Tayer and Jim Bikoff), from a GNSO 
Councilor of IPC (Petter Rindforth), from the IPC Chair (Kristina Rosette), 
from me and from Brian Beckham at Valideus.  ALL SIX responses agreed with the 
WG Consensus position on IGO names at the top-level.

 

Only your views are “divergent”.  You should not be characterizing the IPC 
views as divergent on this point.

 

The WG should take a consensus call to tell the community in the Initial Report 
where there are areas of broad consensus, such as re IGO names at the top level.

 

Thanks,

Mike

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

Tel/Fax: +1.415.738.8087

 <http://rodenbaugh.com> http://rodenbaugh.com

 

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Shatan, Gregory S.
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:29 AM
To: 'Berry Cobb'; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Compiled Responses for Protections Matrix

 

I have attached a spreadsheet which conveys the views of a number of members of 
the IPC (in addition to my own), but which cannot be called a formal statement 
of the IPC.

 

Greg

 

Gregory S. Shatan 
Partner 
Reed Smith LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
212.549.0275 (Phone)
917.816.6428 (Mobile)
212.521.5450 (Fax)
gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
www.reedsmith.com <http://www.reedsmith.com>  

 

 

 

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>  
[mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:17 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Compiled Responses for Protections Matrix

 

Hi All,

 

This is a PDF of the responses compiled thus far for the spreadsheets outlining 
the protections recommendations.

 

Thank you.  B

 

Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

@berrycobb

 

 

 

* * *

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may 
well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice 
of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete 
this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any 
purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your 
cooperation.

* * *

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that, 
unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in 
this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended or written to 
be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under 
the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2) 
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters 
addressed herein.

Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy