Re: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for IGO/INGO PDP WG

[Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agree with both of these suggestions, if earlier doesn't work.



Can we resolve this quickly? I have to schedule other meetings on that day, and 
am trying to work around this WG meeting.



Thanks,



Kiran



Kiran Malancharuvil
Internet Policy Counselor
MarkMonitor
+16199727810

Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.



------ Original Message ------

>From : Mason Cole
To : Gomes, Chuck;
Cc : Kiran Malancharuvil;Berry Cobb;gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx;
Sent : 5/30/2013 7:32 PM
Subject : Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for IGO/INGO 
PDP WG

Two hours later than the existing time -- after the applicant webinar?

Perhaps Thursday June 6 instead of June 5?


On May 30, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

>
> Two hours earlier would be an the exact time that the RySG meets.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Kiran Malancharuvil
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:52 AM
> To: Berry Cobb; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for 
> IGO/INGO PDP WG
>
>
> I support that move as well.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> K
>
>
>
> Kiran Malancharuvil
> Internet Policy Counselor
> MarkMonitor
> +16199727810
>
> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
>
> From : Berry Cobb
> To : gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx;
> Sent : 5/30/2013 9:45 AM
> Subject : RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for 
> IGO/INGO PDP WG
>
> Thank you for the notice, Chuck.
>
> Will there be massive conflict among WG member’s schedules if we were to move 
> the meeting to 14:00 UTC (2 hours earlier)?
>
> B
>
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 720.839.5735
> <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> @berrycobb
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 06:32
> To: Brian Peck; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Erika Randall
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for 
> IGO/INGO PDP WG
>
> Thanks Brian.  I don’t know how many members of this group will be impacted 
> by it, but I wanted to point out that there is an ICANN new gTLD webinar 
> scheduled for Wednesday, 5 June at the time of our WG call next week.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx> 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brian Peck
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 7:38 PM
> To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Erika Randall
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for IGO/INGO 
> PDP WG
>
> Dear Working Group Members,
>
> Thank you again for your comments and suggested edits to the draft Initial 
> Report, and for your time and contributions during today's WG call.
>
> In order to facilitate your review of all the comments received on the first 
> draft, please find attached a consolidated version of the draft Initial 
> Report (v.0.8.6.1) – thanks to Berry for compiling and consolidating the 
> comments into one document.
>
> This version (v0.8.6.1.) - which will serve as the current working document, 
> includes all proposed revisions and comments received prior to today's WG 
> meeting with the exception of those comments from Alan and Chuck which were 
> discussed and agreed upon during the WG call – the relevant revisions based 
> on those discussions are included in this draft.  Please note that staff is 
> still working on other comments discussed during today's call pending further 
> research, clarification and/or re-write.
>
> We would like to request that you please review the suggested 
> revisions/comments in this draft (v.0.8.6.1) and provide any comments and/or 
> questions relating to any proposed revisions you may have concerns about and 
> believe the WG should discuss during next week's call.  In order to manage 
> the number of reviewers and possible comments, we would ask that you please 
> accommodate our following requests in making any comments:
>
>  1.  If you would like to submit a comment or question regarding a proposed 
> revision submitted by other WG members, please use the comment box feature 
> (Insert Comment) and not embed in the text itself.
>  2.  Please refrain from formatting changes - staff will re-format as 
> necessary.
>  3.  In order to keep proper track of individual submissions, please only 
> respond to the version sent by ICANN staff.
> Input Deadline:  3 June 23:59 UTC
> Next Meeting:    5 June 16:00 UTC
>
> Also attached for reference is a pdf version of all the comments originally 
> received prior to today's discussion (e.g., includes the comments from Alan 
> and Chuck which were addressed in the current consolidated version).
>
> Thank you in advance for your cooperation with these requests – prior to next 
> Wednesday's meeting, we will re-consolidate additional comments and provide a 
> revised draft which will also include additional completed revisions based on 
> Alan and Chuck's comments discussed today.  This document will serve as the 
> basis for the next meeting's discussion.
>
> We greatly appreciate your continued support, time and contributions to the 
> WG.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN
>
>
>
>