Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for IGO/INGO PDP WG

[Mason Cole <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Same here.


On May 30, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Kiran Malancharuvil wrote:

> Agree with both of these suggestions, if earlier doesn't work.
> 
> 
> 
> Can we resolve this quickly? I have to schedule other meetings on that day, 
> and am trying to work around this WG meeting.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> Kiran
> 
> 
> 
> Kiran Malancharuvil
> Internet Policy Counselor
> MarkMonitor
> +16199727810
> 
> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
> 
> 
> 
> ------ Original Message ------
> 
> From : Mason Cole
> To : Gomes, Chuck;
> Cc : Kiran Malancharuvil;Berry Cobb;gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx;
> Sent : 5/30/2013 7:32 PM
> Subject : Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for 
> IGO/INGO PDP WG
> 
> Two hours later than the existing time -- after the applicant webinar?
> 
> Perhaps Thursday June 6 instead of June 5?
> 
> 
> On May 30, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Two hours earlier would be an the exact time that the RySG meets.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] 
>> On Behalf Of Kiran Malancharuvil
>> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:52 AM
>> To: Berry Cobb; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Consolidated Draft of Initial Report 
>> for IGO/INGO PDP WG
>> 
>> 
>> I support that move as well.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> K
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kiran Malancharuvil
>> Internet Policy Counselor
>> MarkMonitor
>> +16199727810
>> 
>> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> 
>> From : Berry Cobb
>> To : gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx;
>> Sent : 5/30/2013 9:45 AM
>> Subject : RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for 
>> IGO/INGO PDP WG
>> 
>> Thank you for the notice, Chuck.
>> 
>> Will there be massive conflict among WG member’s schedules if we were to 
>> move the meeting to 14:00 UTC (2 hours earlier)?
>> 
>> B
>> 
>> Berry Cobb
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>> 720.839.5735
>> <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> @berrycobb
>> 
>> 
>> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] 
>> On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
>> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 06:32
>> To: Brian Peck; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Erika Randall
>> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for 
>> IGO/INGO PDP WG
>> 
>> Thanks Brian.  I don’t know how many members of this group will be impacted 
>> by it, but I wanted to point out that there is an ICANN new gTLD webinar 
>> scheduled for Wednesday, 5 June at the time of our WG call next week.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx> 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brian Peck
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 7:38 PM
>> To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Erika Randall
>> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for IGO/INGO 
>> PDP WG
>> 
>> Dear Working Group Members,
>> 
>> Thank you again for your comments and suggested edits to the draft Initial 
>> Report, and for your time and contributions during today's WG call.
>> 
>> In order to facilitate your review of all the comments received on the first 
>> draft, please find attached a consolidated version of the draft Initial 
>> Report (v.0.8.6.1) – thanks to Berry for compiling and consolidating the 
>> comments into one document.
>> 
>> This version (v0.8.6.1.) - which will serve as the current working document, 
>> includes all proposed revisions and comments received prior to today's WG 
>> meeting with the exception of those comments from Alan and Chuck which were 
>> discussed and agreed upon during the WG call – the relevant revisions based 
>> on those discussions are included in this draft.  Please note that staff is 
>> still working on other comments discussed during today's call pending 
>> further research, clarification and/or re-write.
>> 
>> We would like to request that you please review the suggested 
>> revisions/comments in this draft (v.0.8.6.1) and provide any comments and/or 
>> questions relating to any proposed revisions you may have concerns about and 
>> believe the WG should discuss during next week's call.  In order to manage 
>> the number of reviewers and possible comments, we would ask that you please 
>> accommodate our following requests in making any comments:
>> 
>> 1.  If you would like to submit a comment or question regarding a proposed 
>> revision submitted by other WG members, please use the comment box feature 
>> (Insert Comment) and not embed in the text itself.
>> 2.  Please refrain from formatting changes - staff will re-format as 
>> necessary.
>> 3.  In order to keep proper track of individual submissions, please only 
>> respond to the version sent by ICANN staff.
>> Input Deadline:  3 June 23:59 UTC
>> Next Meeting:    5 June 16:00 UTC
>> 
>> Also attached for reference is a pdf version of all the comments originally 
>> received prior to today's discussion (e.g., includes the comments from Alan 
>> and Chuck which were addressed in the current consolidated version).
>> 
>> Thank you in advance for your cooperation with these requests – prior to 
>> next Wednesday's meeting, we will re-consolidate additional comments and 
>> provide a revised draft which will also include additional completed 
>> revisions based on Alan and Chuck's comments discussed today.  This document 
>> will serve as the basis for the next meeting's discussion.
>> 
>> We greatly appreciate your continued support, time and contributions to the 
>> WG.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Brian Peck
>> Policy Director
>> ICANN
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>