[gnso-igo-ingo] Draft Initial Report for IGO/INGO PDP WG
Dear all, We agree with Chuck that, with regard to publication for public comment, the group should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Having said that, we would like to reiterate our recent comments, which were submitted too late for inclusion in version 8.7 of the report. We have included them in the attached document. With respect the tables of protection options, perhaps the problem of distinguishing between the IGOs and INGOs can be solved with a simple explanation clarifying that the optional protection is offered for IGOs and /or INGOs. The two categories of organizations may be considered separately from one another, and need not be considered together. For example: Please Note: In the column labeled "Top-Level Recommendation Options" below, IGO and INGO identifiers are listed together for the sake of simplicity. With respect to each option, IGO and INGO protections may be considered separately from one another. We also note that the text in the comment column of row 1 in each table requires clarification. The current text may simply be an artifact of having merged several versions of the document, but the final version should not indicate that the options in row 1 of each table are inconsistent with the GAC advice and ICANN Board actions, at least with respect to the IOC. Thanks, Jim James L. Bikoff Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP 1101 30th Street, NW Suite 120 Washington, DC 20007 Tel: 202-944-3303 Fax: 202-944-3306 jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx> Attachment:
IGO-INGO_Initial_Report_v0.8.7 (Bikoff).doc
|