[gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Draft Initial Report for IGO/INGO PDP WG

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim's comments and proposed edits seem helpful in my opinion.  In particular, I 
think he has provided improved wording to deal with the concern expressed by 
Ricardo (see his comments 27 & 32 and proposed edits in the 2nd full paragraph 
on page 33 in response to Ricardo's comment 68.

For the report that is to be posted, because the document is a collection of 
text provided by a bunch of different WG members, I wonder if it would be good 
to leave the redline formatting for significant portions of text so that 
readers could see who provided the latest wording?  Would that be too 
confusing?  In cases of minor edits & formatting changes, we could accept them 
so the document is not too cluttered.  It might also be helpful to leave some 
comments in the posted version as well.  Are these crazy ideas?

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jim Bikoff
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:16 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx; mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Draft Initial Report for IGO/INGO PDP WG

Dear Colleagues,

Attached please find our comments on the draft version 8.6.1.  My apologies for 
the delay.  We were held up in mediation all of Monday.

Our most recent comments are reflected in sections 1.3, 2, 4.1.6, 4.2, and 5.4.

Regards,

Jim

James L. Bikoff
Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP
1101 30th Street, NW
Suite 120
Washington, DC 20007
Tel: 202-944-3303
Fax: 202-944-3306
jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>