Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed Agenda: IGO-INGO Meeting for 12 JUNE 2013 @ 16:00 UTC

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I do not belive that we have spent any substantive time on if/how any 
protections we recommend should apply to existing TLDs. Your 
assumption that all protections must find an equivalent expression in 
existing TLDs is a possible outcome, but I don't think we can assume 
it as a premise.
A possible answer to "determine how incumbent registries should meet 
the new policy recommendations, if any" is "not at all". I'm not 
saying that this is a preferred answer from my point of view, just 
that it is a possible answer.
On a process level, it makes some sense to defer the discussion until 
we actually have closure on the new gTLD protections, although it 
does make sense to keep in mind that eventually we will need to look 
at the existing TLDs as well. Presuming we will come to closure....
Alan

At 11/06/2013 10:55 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks that is the one I was looking at.  Wanted to make sure it was 
> the latst and greatest.
> I ,ay be missing it, but I see nothing about the pending charter 
> work item we have not touched yet which is the implication of any 
> new special consideration and how they would be effected on 
> incumbent registries.
> Perhaps I am still missing it.  It seems to me that anything that we 
> impose on new gTLDS must find equivalent expression in existing 
> gTLDs, though the means and time tables may be different.
> thanks
>
> avri
>
>
> On 11 Jun 2013, at 19:17, Berry Cobb wrote:
>
> > Hi Avri,
> >
> > Here is the version that includes both Chuck's and Greg's comments and
> > suggested changes.  Please use the attached to include any suggested edits
> > you may have.
> >
> > Thank you.  B
> >
> > Berry Cobb
> > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> > 720.839.5735
> > mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > @berrycobb
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 16:02
> > To: GNSO IGO INGO (gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx)
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed Agenda: IGO-INGO Meeting for 12 JUNE
> > 2013 @ 16:00 UTC
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have lost track of the draft of record again:
> > Which is the draft of the report that we are reviewing? URL?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8 Jun 2013, at 15:00, Berry Cobb wrote:
> >
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next IGO-INGO PDP Working
> > Group meeting.
> >>
> >>
> >> Proposed Agenda - IGO-INGO WG Meeting - 12 JUNE 2013 @ 16:00 UTC (120
> > Min):
> >> 1.     Roll Call / SOI Update
> >> 2.     Review Initial Report and ready for public comment
> >> 3.     Discussion of Next Steps
> >> 4.     Confirm next meeting (19 June 2013 @ 16:00 (120 MIN))
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you.  B
> >>
> >> Berry Cobb
> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> >> 720.839.5735
> >> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> @berrycobb
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > <IGO-INGO_Initial_Report_v0 9 3 with Gomes and Shatan edits.DOCX>